A year to the day after being action by Nestlé Purina , Blue Buffaloofficially take on that they used by - product repast in a “ substantial ” and “ corporeal ” portion of their preferred foods . Purina was set to catch Blue Buffalo in an advertising lie last year when the company claimed they never used domestic fowl by - product repast in their intellectual nourishment .
Purinadecided to do some inquiry of their own and began test some of Blue Buffalo ’s products . They found that indeed Blue Buffalo had lied to consumers and sued the company for false advertising last May . Last workweek , one year to the sidereal day after the lawsuit was filed , Blue Buffalo squeal to the allegations .
Blue Buffalo also expect the court for some excess fourth dimension to register an amended ill in ordering to name theiringredient suppliersas defendants . Keith Schopp , a spokesperson from Nestlé Purina , said that although Blue Buffalo has accept to using by - Cartesian product repast , they have yet to inform consumer and the caller is refusing to take obligation for it by blaming their suppliers or else .
Photo: abcnews.com
Last year Blue Buffalo ’s CEO claimed that the examination done by Purina was “ Voodoo Science ” and the allegations were whole untrue . Schopp say that the society only admitted the prevarication when face with undeniable trial impression . He says that it is unclear whether they have stop using the by - product meal or if pet food containing it is still available on store shelves .
Schopp also add that Blue Buffalo is now claiming that they had no room of knowing that there was by - Cartesian product repast in their bags of dog solid food .
Keith Schopp thinks that is pathetic and that a manufacturer is always responsible for knowing what iscontained in their product . He says a simple audit of the company ’s supply concatenation would have showed there was by - mathematical product meal in the pet food .
Photo: bluebuffalo.com
Purina believes that Blue Buffalo owes consumers an apology and that it is time for them to betransparent with the publicabout what ingredient they are using and where they are source from . Purina also insists that by - products are safe and nutritious pet food ingredients , and that is not what this lawsuit is about .
The company has no argumentation about the nutritionary value of the nutrient . The issuance is simply false advert and truth - in - labeling . They tested some of Blue Buffalo ’s top marketing product when doing the initial research for this lawsuit , and experience it is only clean for consumers to know what element are in the dog intellectual nourishment that they are feed their beloved pet .
