If you live on in an urban area , you probably take your firedog for walks in a public position . Public parks , nature trails and designated firedog parks are great options for favorite parents looking for somewhere safe to exercise with their dog . Have you ever wondered what kinds ofchemicals are usedwhen landscape these type of public places ? perhaps you should start thinking about it .
Dog owners in San Francisco have begun gathering in opposition of the late terror to theircanine companions – the city ’s Parks and Recreation Department . The resistance comes on the heels of information being released that shows that the city uses an herbicide label as carcinogenic by the body politic of California to hold a lean of invasive species in parks throughout San Francisco .
Those who expend time in the parks are concerned about the effects the herbicide will have on dogs as well as people , especially tiddler . Glyphosate , the herbicide in question , is commercially deal as Monsanto ’s Roundup , and in March of this twelvemonth it was labeled as “ in all probability carcinogenic ” by the World Health Organization .
Photo: inhabitat.com
In response to the use of the weed killer , one implicated parking lot departer has launched a petition on change.org hoping to convince lawmakers to “ ban dangerous pesticide use of goods and services at school and public parkland . ” The petition tells the tale of how a parent found out that the chemical was going to be spray at a commons near her child ’s nursery school . After check preindication station warning parents about glyphosate , that same parent happen upon this :
“ A few of my local neighbor have observe to me that their pawl who once dally freely in this particular park came down with unusual mouth and nose cancers , and now they believe this San Francisco politics practice of spraying Roundup in this park is the reason for this . ”
According to Inhabitat.com , a design and technology blog , it ’s not just one parking area user that has concerns . The website document the case of two other pet parents who believe that the weedkiller is responsible for their dog ’s strangecancer developmentas well . Caroline Plakias , a San Francisco resident , had this to say about her dog that come up down with cancer :
Photo: articles.baltimoresun.com
“ … she catch cancer when she was two years old and her veterinary said it was really strange to see a mast cell tumour in such a young dog and also in her strain ( boundary line collie mix ) . I ’ve converge several hound owner in Glen Canyon Park who say their pups have had weird cancers of the nose and mouth . ”
The petition already has over 600 signatures from local residents who are concerned for their rubber and the safety of their darling . The San Francisco Parks and Rec Department has yet to annotate on the issue as of the publishing of this article . word of advice sign or not , it seems to me thatchemicals like thisshould be banned from being used in public surface area .
It ’s also surprising to me that this is the first issue that San Francisco Parks and Rec has had . If multiple blackguard owners have suspected the chemical was have cancer in canine , why was n’t something said before now ? Granted , there is no cogent evidence that this herbicide has caused cancer in any dog , but if it were me , I would certainly be take care for a way to link up the two together . This also arrive at me concern about what other cities and township are spray on the sess in their public commons . It ’s definitely something that more pet parents ( and human parents ) should be aware of , specially if your frankfurter is tender of eating pasture .
Photo: metrotomountain.com
